Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports. Show all posts

Sunday, March 01, 2015

Sport's trivia day

Been lax this month. No excuse. I just didn't think the things I was thinking about would interest anyone. And, please don't comment that they are never interesting to anyone else. These are just some sport's trivia questions that I liked. Not that I'm some kind of sport's trivia expert at all, and I had to look up the answers to some of which I only had a general idea. The answer key is at the end so jot down your answers as you go, or you'll see all the answers when you check one.




1. There has been only one successful drop kick in the NFL since the 1940s, and it was made on the very last play of this player's career.



a. Doug Flutie  b. Archie Manning  c. Jan Stenerud  d. James Brown



2.  One of these Yankees did not win the MVP award three times.



a. Yogi Berra  b. Joe DiMaggio  c. Lou Gehrig  d. Mickey Mantle


3. The last commissioner of the ABA was -



a. Willis Reed  b. Dave DeBusschere  c. Red Holtzman  D. George Mikan


4. The '76 U.S. Hockey Team won the Olympic Gold medal by beating -



a. Finland  b. USSR   c. Sweden  d. Czechoslovakia


5. Secretariat has since 1973 held the Kentucky Derby and Belmont Stakes records. Who has the record for the Preakness?



a. Affirmed   b. Seattle Slew   c. Curlin  d. Secretariat




6. The incredible Stella Walsh (Stanislawa Walasiewicz - We use her Americanized name) was the 1932 Olympic women's 100 meter champion for the Polish team.  One little problem discovered in 1980 has resulted in a bit of a controversy, yet unresolved.



a. Finding an old film no one had watched, a journalist noticed her getting a ridiculous false start lead not picked up in the days before instant replay until then.  b. She was the first Olympic athlete to admit using a then-new training technique - anabolic steroids  c.  Hanna Suchocka did not qualify for the team, but came along with her girlfriend, Stella; when Stella hurt herself tripping over her trunk, they looked enough alike for Hanna to step in. No one noticed until Hanna died and Stella came forth.   d. She was a man, baby. 



7. The great boxer Joe Louis did not lose to -



a. Ezzard Charles.  b. Jersey Joe Walcott  c. Rocky Marciano  d. Max Schmeling


8. He is the all-time Boston Celtic leader in points scored, games and minutes played, field goals attempted and made among others, including personal fouls. He was second in free throws attempted and made.



a. Paul Pierce  b. John Havlicek  c. Larry Bird  d. Robert Parrish


9.  He won more Grand Slam singles championships in the 1960s than any other men's tennis player.



a. Rod Laver  b. Ken Rosewall  c. Roy Emerson  d. John Newcombe


10. How far do they actually ski jump? The current world record is -



a. 550 feet    b. 700 feet  c. 825 feet  d. 1025 feet

Answers below









 ANSWERS
1. a. Doug Flutie, NE Patriots, Jan. 1, 2006, age 43.


2. c. Lou Gehrig only won twice. 


3. b. Dave DeBusschere made the jump from the Knicks' management.  Mikan was the league's first commissioner.


4.  No, not the USSR.  The answer is a.  Finland.  The Miracle on Ice against the USSR had already happened earlier in the medal round.


5.  d. Secretariat. Although he set the record in 1973, of course, it was not recognized by the Maryland Racing Commission until 2012. It was always known that Secretariat's electronically recorded time made no sense, but it wasn't until three years ago the commission held a hearing and was convinced by the evidence using modern technology that he had run faster than Curlin in 2007 and two other horses before him.


6. d. She was a man, baby. Sort of, anyway.  It was learned in her 1980 autopsy (killed during a robbery) that she had genital characteristics for both sexes and almost an equal number of male/female chromosomes. BTW, Hanna Suchocka is the name of the first female Polish Prime Minister in the 1990s.  Anyway, back to Stella, it may explain her 18 world records and the fact that she was also great at hurling the discus.


7.  b.  Jersey Joe was actually the last man Louis beat in his last championship defense.  Schmeling beat him before he was champ, and Charles and Marciano beat him a couple of years after he retired and tried to come back - almost always a bad idea.


8. b.  Hondo, John Havlicek.  Bird and Pierce are up there with him in most of these categories.


9. c. Actually, Roy Emerson, though you'd probably guess Rod Laver (he won 11). Laver was nevertheless the greatest player of his era. In fact, Laver won 48 of their 66 matches and 7 of 9 of their Grand Slam matches.   


10. c. 825 feet.  When you realize that's over 2 1/2 football fields including the end zones and visualize it - - yikes!

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Football

Football!!!!!!

I don't know what happened. I loved football when I was a kid. I was so upset once when Baltimore beat Dallas in a big game that I was furious at my little brother for teasing me about it (and, umm, I might have kicked him). This was only a few years after I was devastated that Baltimore had lost the World Series to the Mets - my local NY team and Cinderella story.  Anyway, after the Dallas debacle, I swore to myself that however exciting it might be, I would never to care so much again about a silly sport. I can't say I ever have cared that much since, but I came close last week.

For a while I actually stopped caring about football at all. Maybe it was the late 1980s. Then for years, there was nothing but the Super Bowl and sometimes a playoff game or so. When I moved to Va. in 2008 I decided to just put it on in the background on Sundays and maybe pick up a little more about it, so that when the playoffs came I could have a clue what was going on. I liked the ambiance of it, liked even to sit in pubs and watch it. But, I pretty much only watched Sunday. Super Bowl usually meant someone's house for a party.

Year after year, I watched more and more. Suddenly this year, 2013, I find myself virtually addicted to it. Suddenly all day Sunday, Monday and Thursday nights and then the NFL Network several hours almost every day. Suddenly, I care again which teams win. Suddenly, if my players don't do well, I feel bad about it. I can't believe it. I'm back.

A few weeks ago all the teams I wanted to win were getting the tar beaten out of them and I was frustrated and felt a little down. Then, they started to win again the last two weeks and it made me happy. When New England beat Denver a few weeks back, well, I was as exultant as I have been since the night Pres. Obama announced that Osama bin Laden was dead. I wish I could say that wasn't true.

So, here are some football thoughts.

Home teams: Not even when I was a young did I get the home team thing. What do I care that the Jets and Giants play in NY? Of course, they really haven't played in NY in years, which makes it even more senseless to me. And why them and not the Buffalo Bills, who actually play here?  But, it's not just NY teams. I don't get why I should care about a particular team anywhere over the years more than any other team, unless they merit it. It's not like I know the player's personally (well, one, my whole life - another time for that).

Teams often have mostly different players a few years down the road. The owners stay the same for a longer time, but, is that who we are rooting for when we root for the home team - the owners? Unlikely. Nothing is more annoying after a Triple Derby race when we have to listen to the owners take the credit.  I don't even know who owns the Jets and Giants any more. Is it still the Maras and Hess? I gave up and just took a look at the wiki list of owners, so there is still a Mara involved with the Giants. I recognized three names on the list and I'm pretty sure they are the children of owners whose names I knew. But, that begets the real question which is still - why do we care at all about the home team when the players change so much, perhaps other than some "franchise" players.

Maybe the real question for most people would be the reverse - why don't I care, since it seems like devotion to the home team is either a normal human affection or part of our culture?  It probably has something to do with my disinclination to join groups or feel like part of one in general.  I know I do feel like part of the country and my family -- and that is sort of like rooting for a home team. But, there are actual reasons for those associations. I am attached to my country because of American ideals, even though we execute them imperfectly and have no interest in jingoism or exhibiting patriotism. But, I do not extend even this little bit of seeming home teamism to the sports world. When I watch the Olympics I generally root for whoever I think is best and possibly will set a record, rather than who is the Americans. There are always exceptions. I had no interest in our gold medal Olympic hockey or basketball teams winning, except for the 1984 dream team, who were potentially the greatest team in history. With regard to my family I actually only speak with and like those I know and have something in common with - that is, I either grew up in the same household with them or know them all my life. I have had no interest in meeting relatives I don't know just because they are technically related.  I don't pick my friends based on proximity to my home either. What I'm trying to say over and over again here by these examples is - I don't care about the home team and I don't understand why others do. I know it's a little (strange, unconventional, weird - whatever?) but that's the way I feel.

This is the best I can do with it is this. If a home team - the Jets or Giants are in the Super Bowl, I admit it hypes my interest in the game because so many people around me are interested and the enthusiasm is a little contagious. On the other hand, I didn't root for the Jets when they won the first Super Bowl for the AFL. The one year that I rooted for the Giants to beat the almost perfect Patriots was because of the story line, and because when the Giants lost to them during the regular season I had made the prediction that they would likely beat them if they met them in the Super Bowl season because of Eli's rapid growth as a quarterback and I . . . just . . . wanted . . . to . . . be . . . right . . . for . . .  once about the Super Bowl (my record of incorrect Super Bowl predictions is legendary).

This year while some of my friends are in agony (seriously) over the Jets and Giants, I could care less. There's enough things in life to worry about if you want.

QBs

With the rare super star drawing equal attention - an LT, a Jerry Rice, a Walter Payton - QBs get most of the attention in the league. It's understandable. With rare, rare exception, you need a top performer in that position to win more than any other, though, of course, if you are going to win the Super Bowl, everything must be clicking. A little while ago I evaluated the greatest quarterbacks in history. I feel more confident about my top ten than I do about the bottom. I'm still not sure that Warren Moon and John Brodie and some others do not belong on the list somewhere and a few of them not on it. But, that's the nature of the beast when you make top ten lists. I once made a list of best animal cartoon characters here and the commenter known as Conchis pointed out that I had left off Rocky and Bullwinkle. Now that's embarrassing.

There have been a lot of rule changes in the last few years designed to protect the QB. It has changed the game. What it means to me is that records for passers and receivers are not going to be equivalent to those they are breaking. E.g., When Manning shatters Brady's TD record this year (unless he gets hurt, he will likely smash it) it will not be clear to me he broke an equivalent record. It's not like everyone is throwing 7 touchdown games this year, but one other guy did. Is it the same as throwing  7 touchdowns in game years ago? Probably not. That's not to say it isn't any amazing achievement. No knock on Peyton Manning at all - he is a hall of famer and easily one of the greatest QBs ever - I'm sure he will have supporters for no. 1 all time, but his statistics aren't really measureable against Dan Marino's, just as an example. Of course, in my humble opinion.

A pet peeve - I wish that commentators would stop saying after a QB throws a great touchdown pass in the corner of the end zone that only 2 or 3 other QBs could make that throw. It's not true. I've seen mediocre NFL QBs do it. They practice it and many of them, probably most starters, and a number of back ups can do it.

The following is actually not a list, But, recognizing how controversial these things are and how I might change my mind tomorrow, these are my QB thoughts.

How much is the team? - We look at history and almost reflexively assign to presidents the successes and failures of others that he had very little or more likely nothing to do with. We do the same with quarterbacks. Without a good line in front of them, some QBs will still thrive (they have to be either a great scrambler or have a quick release), but there's no doubt that great lines add to a QB's stats and preserve him for the next game. The same goes for receivers. You need people who can catch the ball just as they need someone who will give them a chance. Great lines and great receivers make great QBs and vise versa.

Young guys

RGIII - I was not a huge RGIII fan from the beginning. Nothing not to like. Great athlete, personal, smart, soft spoken and even male model looks. I liked him. I just didn't think he was all that. His first year came in the same year any number of great young quarterbacks arrived. He was certainly among the best of them, but I really didn't think he was better than Kaepernik (who didn't start until late in the season), Andrew Luck or Russell Wilson -- though he really became a star this year. Nick Foles didn't take off until this year, but I would take him over RGIII too and though I like Tannehill (also a high pick like Luck and Griffin) down in Miami, he hasn't garnered national attention. Most of them can throw and run. But, RGIII seemed to get most of the attention. Perhaps he was just more personable, better looking and media savvy than Andrew Luck, who seemed to be the professional commentators' favorite. RGIII's game was also very similar to Cam Newton, drafted the year before, who's star seemed to fade last year but is shining again now. RGIII also had an impossible great game, going 15/16 with 4 TD's, something accomplished only by Steve Young before him, my pick for the all time greatest QB. But, that's one game, not a season or career. There's no doubt, he may not be the "one," but he had the potential to be a great quarterback.

So, this week Mike Shanahan, the Redskins coach, suffering through a terrible year after looking so good late last year and watching his young quarterback struggle back from injury, announced they were benching him for the last three games of the season and set the football world on fire. The rationale was that because he was the franchise quarterback, he needed to be preserved for next season and it was not only for his own good, but done with the approval of the team ownership.

RGIII has been respectful, some arguing too respectful of the decision.

Reading and watching the professional commentators, there were two perspectives, but almost all of them were pro-playing him. The feeling was that a) he had earned the right to play and was the franchise quarterback b) the fans were entitled to it c) it would demoralize him d) it would demoralize the team, many of the players who play with pain and injury. The other perspective, that maybe Coach Shanahan was right that he needed to be preserved was correct, was in the definitive minority.

Me, I was very happy, but not because I don't like the guy or wish the team ill. Here's why. I've caught Redskin games the past couple of weeks. Three weeks ago I was stunned by what happened to him. I could barely watch as he got pummeled, sacked and speared. In turn, perhaps because self preservation kicked in or maybe on the coaches instruction, he just started getting rid of the ball almost as fast as he got it. I don't blame him. You hit me like that, I'm getting rid of the ball too. I thought Coach Shanahan had actually understated it, perhaps to preserve the morale of his team and especially his offensive line's. Because they were responsible. No different than the less highly praised Geno Smith in NY, I felt his confidence was being destroyed.

Ryan Tannehill

I'm going to make this prediction - if he stays healthy, in 5-7 years, people will say that RT is as good or better than any QB who came out with him. This is solely based on my impression watching him.

I like this kid. He was the third QB drafted in for the 2012-13 season after Luck and Griffin. He gets nowhere near the press though some think this is the greatest QB incoming group in perhaps 20 years.  He can throw. I don't know if it is measured anywhere, but I think he throws the long ball deeper than any QB in the league. If not, he's got to be up there. He is sometimes criticized for throwing interceptions and he should be. But, the equipment is there. Give him a team like the Patriots, Seattle, NO, NE, Denver, etc., and I think he would progress very fast.

Andrew Luck

Some commentators are very high on him. He definitely is a very good quarterback. Over and over again I hear that they love that he is always looking, when in the pocket, downfield. That doesn't seem like rocket science to me, but okay. He is also a pretty good runner and a great athlete though you wouldn't know it to look at him. I think many professional commentators like him because he reminds them of the classic pocket quarterback like the Mannings, Rodgers and Brady, though he can run better than them (actually, Rodgers can run too). I can understand that, because I think pocket quarterbacks aren't history yet, and may end up with the better careers than the runners. Like with Griffin, I just don't think he is all that. But, certainly good enough. Star? I don't see it yet.

Oh, and I wish he would lose the beard.

Russell Wilson

One more of the new breed of quarterback that runs like a half back. Tired of hearing that he's short, that he was drafted low (is 3rd round really that bad?) and that if he wasn't short, he would have been drafted much higher, perhaps first. Seattle is obviously awesome this year, and may be on their way to a Super Bowl. He's got a lot of protection and a great team. His defense keeps him on the field. Yet, his stats do not overwhelm. I think he will be around for a long time. I do not see anything that tells me all time great.

Nick Foles

Also a sophomore, he's obviously setting the world on fire in Philly. It is probably lucky for the team that Vicks got hurt, because he had probably reached his prime and wasn't leading them to a Super Bowl. Out of all the second year quarterbacks, he might actually be the most impressive. 7 TDs in one game, 19 in a row without a pick.  I wish I could see him play, but it hasn't happened yet. So, I'll shut up about him.

Cam Newton

I thought he might be overrated and the subject of hyperbole in his first year and thought he was picked upon and underappreciated in the light of RGIII last year. This year, he is playing better than the last, but really, he doesn't show me that he's a great either.

Colin Kaepernik

Another young QB who got a lucky break in 2012 when the starting QB went down and played not only well enough to keep the job, but to get to the Super Bowl. Out of the crop of thrower/runners, he actually impressed me more than RGIII, Newton, Wilson or others. But, obviously, he is not playing that great this year in any dimension. But, when you look at his stats compared to Russell Wilson, sure Wilson's are a little better, but, he's got a much better team. Kaepernick has a lot of potential. He's as much a franchise QB as any of the youngsters, but, he's got to throw the ball better. Pretty obvious, but that's the story. I think he will. In fact, everything being equal, but looking ahead 5-7 years, I am predicting him no. 2 rated among this impressive group.

Middle Group

Eli Manning

I rate him a very good QB, not a great one, despite the two Super Bowl victories. He doesn't have the arm though he has the head. Still, give me one game and the team of my choice, I'd be as happy or happier with him than most other QBs. And, I'm looking past this horrible season.

Phillip Rivers

I may be a little biased in this as the night I am writing this his Chargers beat the better team, the Broncos in Denver. That surprised me. Rivers could actually be as talented as any QB in the game, but his consistency is the problem. Often it is just not playing for as good a team as others, but it doesn't seem like it with him. He just blows hot and cold. Still, lots of potential to be elite there.

Ben Roethlisberger

He could be a great QB if he was healthier. He himself acknowledged that injuries in 2012 hurt his conference. My opinion. He's friggin' crazy to have played. But, he may be, probably is, the toughest QB in the league and has all the talent to do anything with the right team. Of course, he's already proven that.  I don't quite think he is in the very elite group, but he's at the very top of the next tier.

Tony Romo

I think Tony Romo takes so much abuse because people believe he could be in the elite group. He certainly seems to have the talent. I'm not sure he's ever had the team for it though.

Joe Flacco

He won the Super Bowl last year and some were saying he was now the man. I didn't believe it and this year kind of bears that out. He's sure good enough, and, actually, personally, I like him a lot. But he's not elite. I heard him say before the season started that some people didn't like his team because they thought they were not good enough to win a Super Bowl. He was right. I was one of them. Their year does not surprise me.

The elites

There are four right now that I see - Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees. I don't know who is the best though I am going to give you my preference. They are all fantastic. Obviously, being a little older puts Brady and Manning in their own category, but I don't know that the other two aren't every bit as good. You'd be crazy not to take any of them even at later stages of their career.

But, Manning v. Brady - who is best? Look, you can't deny that both are hall of famers and great quarterbacks. I prefer Brady and think he is a little better. Feel free to disagree. You could compare stats and Manning surpasses him in many categories, but, stats are not everything (when you like the player with the lesser stats better). At the end of any game, I want the ball in Brady's hands. He reminds me of Larry Bird. If the Celtics were down 6 points with a minute to play, I felt the other team didn't have a chance if Bird was on the floor. Feel the same about Brady, and once he had a full healthy team of receivers, he won every QB match up - four in a row, and I think came back to win it late in each and every one. He has far fewer comeback winners than Manning historically (who has more than almost anyone ever), but I think part of that reason is that Brady's teams were usually ahead, at least more so than Manning's teams. I could be wrong about that and I don't have the stats to back it up. I thought about doing a post just on Manning-Brady, but decided against it. Maybe some day.

A few things interest me. For one thing, too many people say they hate Tom Brady. At the same time they usually say he is a great QB - they just hate him.  Part of that impression may be I live in NY and he is a natural target for Jet fans and thanks to the Super Bowl, also the Giants. I do not expect home team fans to be rational about these things. But, I also think some people hate him because he's not only great, but he's ridiculously good looking (my favorite line this week from an article was - "If Megyn Kelly were to paint a portrait of Jesus, I assume he would look like Tom Brady (written by Jeffrey Goldberg)" and he's married to one of the most beautiful women in the world. He almost always says exactly the right thing and maintains his poise off the field in answering questions better than any player in the league - though, that's not a stat we can measure. What I really like about him. First, he's a great story, being a six or seventh round draft pick (I forget which) who, worked his way from 4th string to 2nd string QB when he got his lucky break by Drew Bledsoe, NE's excellent starting QB, getting hurt. He's a three time SB champ who would be a four time champ if the last time his great receivers (including Welker) could have held onto the ball, he's ridiculously consistent and in my mind, the coolest hand in the league in the last minutes of a game. You can't measure these things, of course.

Another thing that interests me is that people don't follow the usual  win-weighted rules in comparing Brady and Manning that they usually do when unfairly putting one player over another - like Russell over Chamberlain.  It's not that I disagree. I think the win thing is overrated, though it has to mean something.  Brady has a 3-1 Super Bowl advantage. His  17 playoff wins with Championship advantage.  Brady has won a record 17 playoff games, Manning a record loser 11 (tied with Favre).  Brady's teams have beat Manning's 10-4. Their post-season passing ratings are almost identical (Manning's slightly better).  Manning has many more td passes but he has thrown a lot more. The same is true of interceptions and the two go together. Brady fumbles more, but has been sacked more and the two go together there also.  Frankly, Manning is at least equal if not superior in most statistical comparisons, though you have to balance for two extra years. Manning will likely break Brady's single season td record this year, but not by much and in a year where the rules for hitting QBs has changed significantly. I'm not positive it is comparable.

Unlike Manning, Brady is not having a record setting year. But, some commentators recognize he spend most of the season with  a severely depleted team. If for no other reason, he didn't have Welker this year and Manning did. It makes a big difference. In fact, despite Manning's fireworks all season, some commentators have said this year that Brady was actually more impressive, simply because he was working with so much less. There were four games this year when Gronkowski was healthy and we saw what Brady could do with his team at full strength, topped no doubt by the 34-31 victory over Denver after being down 24-0 at the half.

Feel free to disagree. Enough about quarterbacks.

My picks. 

As the season was about to start, the ferocious commenter known as Bear emailed me with his Super Bowl predictions - Seahawks versus Broncos. He's looking pretty prescient, although they've both come down to earth a little the past few weeks. Nevertheless, they are still looking like the cream of their conferences.

My picks were done with less confidence (probably because he's so much better at it than I am), but I picked San Francisco again in the NFC. I wasn't sure who I picked in the AFC - thought it might have been NE - and had to look it up in my emails and to my surprise, I picked Denver too. Not as dumb as I thought. My back ups picks were NE in the AFC, which is still a reasonable choice (Gronk going down may change that though) and GB in the NFC, which doesn't look very likely, but still technically a possibility.  Obviously Bear's Seattle pick was better than my SF, but that may have been true last year too and SF made it. We'll see, won't we?

Dancing

I cannot finish a post on the NFL without a word about how much I despise the end zone and sack dances. This is just a rant - I admit it. And, I've said it all before, but it really irks me. I love the NFL Network, but honestly, the fact that they do a segment every week doing a mock Dancing with the Stars type thing just irritates me, even if they don't take it seriously at all. I know, I'm a cranky, crusty old man (who doesn't dance, by the way, so . . . ), but these acts of self congratulation and unabashed crowing would have embarrassed Peter Pan, for crying out loud. It's down right cringe worthy. Yccchh.

If it were my kid who did something like that after a good moment, I would have taken her aside and said "Never do that again, honey."

The fact that some players do it when they are losing or their team has losing records is even worse. And if I were the coach and my team lost, the first film session the next day would be of them dancing in the end zone. I say again. Yccchh.

Rant over. Post over. Now I'm irritated and not going to even casually proof. Go easy on me.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Sport lists


I don't spend a lot of time on sports in this blog because sports has not been a big part of my adult life. But, once in a while, why not? Here are some top ten lists.  I can allow people a little argument, but after a week or so I am going to make these lists official and binding on everyone in the world unless you can change my mind. The opinions are mine, but the stats, of course, I had to look up.

Top twenty NFL Quarterbacks

I'm considering retired players only to avoid dealing with Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers (who I sometimes call Aaron Brown. I know, I know) and Drew Brees, all who would fit in her somewhere. My opinion here is not based on Super Bowls, though winning championships is worth something, but who was the most talented and accomplished in my opinion.

Historic (Started watching football in the mid-60s and Unitas and Starr are the first QBs I remember).

1. Steve Young - I know this will be controversial so I'll defend it a bit. First, he spent the first seven years of his career when he would have the most energy and be most uninjured wasting it in the USFL, playing in Tampa and then sitting behind Joe Montana, also one of the greatest quarterbacks ever. They should have traded one of them. If so, they might have would have won even more championships because both couldn't play at the same time and they could have gotten some great talent with a trade. I would have traded Montana and there would be no disputing my putting Young first at all. Even when he got a rare chance to step in and play in SF he could be awesome. I still remember in his first year when he came in for an injured Montana and threw 4 touchdowns like he had been starting for years. But, in the seven years that it was his show (when he was healthy) he won the Super Bowl, won the passing title 4 times (only a few others have done that), set the standard for being the highest rated quarterback - is still the highest rated of all retired QB's and still remains no. 3 overall despite the fact that it is so much easier now that no one is even allowed to frown or think mean thoughts about the QB when they tackle him.  He is also, and I think this is sometimes overlooked about him, the no. 3 rushing QB of all time (and the two ahead of him, Vick and Cunningham, cannot begin to compete with him overall). He also rushed for more TDs than any other QB. Many other records but that is for Wikipedia. He did all this despite being injured over and over including multiple concussions.  For what it is worth, though I don't factor it in, I also always thought he had a great attitude, being competitive, but keeping it in perspective.

2. Dan Marino - Just nicked by Young. He is probably even a better passer, although he could not run to save his life. His arm was incredibly quick, powerful and accurate.

3. Dan Fouts  - And if Marino wasn't the greatest passer, then it might have been Fouts. I wonder what would have happened if he played on a really good team.

4. Sonny Jurgenson - A personal favorite. He could pass, run, everything. But, passing was his forte and still at age 40, even splitting time, he won the passing title.  

5. Joe Montana - He was a great QB and I need say nothing more about him, such is his fame. I know many people think he was the best and I'm not knocking him at all by placing him 5th. I just think the other four were better.

6. Johnny Unitas - He was the greatest for many years and some would put him at the top given the rigor of the game then and his great consistency.

7. Bart Starr - Unitas' competition. He was the NFL's Russell to Unitas' Chamberlain.

8. John Elway - Some surveys rank him first. He had an amazing ability to come back and went to the Super Bowl, not always with the best team, repeatedly.

9. Brett Favre - Probably as good as Elway and maybe better. You have to make choices and I just like Elway better. But there are those who think he is the best ever.

10. Len Dawson - Take away Namath's fame because he won the first Super Bowl for the AFL and Dawson is the greater of the two. But, Dawson won the big one the next year, in the last game for the AFL. His accuracy was incredible.

11. Roger Staubach - In his time, maybe the best for a few years.

12. Jim Kelly - If he could have won just once it would have been justice.

13. Fran Tarkenton  - My favorite scrambler and yet a great passer. Reminds me of Jurgenson a lot.

14. Kurt Warner - A great story, coming out of arena football. It's possible I might have him way too low.

15. Terry Bradshaw  - Not as talented as many others here, particularly as a passer, but much better than most. His clutch play, toughness and many rings earn his entry here.

16. Troy Aikman - He seems forgotten now in the era of Peyton Manning and Tom Brady, but he was in their league.

17. Daryle Lamonica - Lamonica was probably my favorite quarterback, along with Dawson, back in the 60s, and not just because of the Heidi game (if you don't know what that means, look it up, as it somewhat changed television programming). He certainly had great receivers, but someone had to put the ball in their hands and great quarterbacks tend to have great receivers. He was very clutch. I always thought Oakland had a chance to win if he could get the ball.

18. Joe Theisman - Best known for what Lawrence Taylor did to his leg, but I thought a great player.

19. Joe Namath - I never liked Namath's game all that much, but you can't deny that he helped change football forever. He did not have great career stats, but did have a few outrageous years. Still, he helped make the NFL what is by winning that first Super Bowl for the AFL in 69, famously guaranteeing it before the game. I am also influenced by Bill Walsh's and Don Shula's high opinion of him because if I could have anyone advise me on drafting a QB, they'd be up there (I know Walsh is dead - leave me alone).

20. Bob Griese - The Dolphins were arguably the two greatest pro team of the 1970s and Griese was their guy except when injured.  He was there for their two great Super Bowl years, though I suppose you could argue Mrs. Griese could have successfully quarterbacked them those years.

Sorry Warren Moon.  I'm sure others. Everyone can't be on the list.

Prehistoric times

1. Otto Graham

2. Y.A. Tittle

3. Norm Van Brocklin

4. Sammy Baugh

5. Sid Luckman

Top ten NBA centers to date

This includes active players, but only one makes the list.

1. Wilt Chamberlain - I know Russell won all those championships and Chamberlain just one.  Certainly being part of a championship team, and more so, many championships, means something.  I just find it a ridiculous contention though to suggest that it is the main factor though I hear that even from renowned commentators. However, it is a factor that is randomly applied only to some players. For example, after Russell, the player who won the most championships in the NBA is Sam Jones, who won 10. Certainly he was a very good player. I don't know if you would say he was great.  I don't think that anyone would say though that he was even remotely as good as Oscar Robertson, who won only one. Some other players who won multiple championships: Robert Horry, a very good, but certainly not a great player, won 7. John Salley, also a good player, won 4. Winning championships means that someone was on the best team, and perhaps was a big part of it, but it does not necessarily mean he was better than the next guy. You can wiki Chamberlain's stats. Arguably, he was the greatest player, relative to other players at the same position and at the same time, in the history of major pro sports. No one else has approached his personal dominance. His 100 points and his 55 rebounds in games just show how far ahead of others he was.  Other than his free throw shooting problems, he could do anything. He even once just decided to lead the league in assists, unheard of for a center, and just did it.

2. Bill Russell - All that being said about winning championships being overused, Russell is number 2 because it does mean something and winning 11 can't be ignored. Though he cannot compare with Chamberlain stats, he is arguably the second greatest rebounder in history and perhaps the greatest shot blocker - they didn't keep stats for it when he played. He certainly was the first great shot blocker and I can see him in my mind's eye coming across the lane to block a shot with incredibly grace and timing. He was not a great shooter by any stretch (his career free throw percentage is barely better than Chamberlain's and his field goal percentage nowhere near as good)  and that is the great difference between him and number 1.

3. Akeen Olajuwon -  Now it gets interesting. You know Russell and Chamberlain are at the top of the list. Who is next? I'd say that Olajuwon was. Physically, he was a phenomenon.  It seemed like he could jump twice in the time it took most other centers to jump once. He had no serious weaknesses.  Like many centers he was not a great free throw shooter, he could hit more than 7 in 10, so unlike with Russell, Chamberlain and many other great centers, it could not be automatic to foul him at the end of the game. Even a great big man cannot dominate these days to the degree Chamberlain or Russell did because so many other players are near their size or bigger now, if not as talented. So, his stats don't look like theirs, but for his time, his speed, jumping ability and all around play was remarkable. For some reason he was always listed as 7'0", but commentators regularly pointed out and he acknowledged that he was actually two inches shorter and not that big for a center. It didn't stop him from being a dominant rebounder and among the greatest shot blockers ever.  He is one of 4 players ever to have a quadruple double (4 stats in double figures).  He was clutch and it always seemed to me that he won the duels between the other big men when they matched up.

4. Kareem Abdul Jabbar - No doubt that many would say that Jabbar belongs in the top three and some would even argue no. 1 or 2, so awe inspiring are his stats. I put him just below it. He played a long time and in some categories he is the all-time career leader.  Other than the usual free throw shooting problem, he had no weaknesses. But, I do not think he was as great a leader, as great a rebounder or as great a shot blocker as he could have been.  But, he was one of the greatest scorers. The sky hook made him the last and probably greatest hook shot artist in pro basketball and when he was on, it was unstoppable.

5. Nate Thurmond - You may not have heard of him, as his career ended in the 70s and he is not really celebrated outside of San Francisco.  But, famous or not, putting him 5th is not really a tough call. The NBA recognized it in celebrating its 50th anniversary, named him as one of the 50 greatest players ever. Chamberlain and Jabbar recognized it, both saying he was the toughest defender they ever faced - which is saying a lot.  He was considered, after Russell, the greatest shot blocker of the 60s and 70s and though you can't measure it, many thought he set the best picks in NBA history. He played much of his career against Russell and Chamberlain, the two greatest centers ever and held his own better than anyone else.  He was the first man ever to make the quadruple double, including blocked shots, and he did it late in his career.  I like this story he tells about when Chamberlain and he played together in San Francisco and then Chamberlain was traded. Chamberlain took him aside and said that Thurmond shouldn't think Chamberlain was being traded because Thurmond was the better player. It was, Chamberlain said, because he was making $75,000 and Thurmond only $20,000. But, he was wrong, says Thurmond. He was only making $14,000.

6. Shaquille O'Neal - Another center who could not shoot fouls. But so what. He was so dominant in his time because of his physical size and prowess that with even a decent team he was close to unstoppable in the paint. No one could handle him there. Though 325 pounds he could also run and play the fast break. He's famous enough and recent enough that I will stop there. 

7. David Robinson - Robinson is not as famous as many of these other guys but he deserves to be here. He accomplished what he did despite missing what should have been his first two years while he served in the Navy. He is the third center with Thurmond and Olajuwan to achieve a quadruple double (though it is possible, maybe even likely that Chamberlain or Russell did it before they counted blocked shots). He is one of 5 players to score more than 70 points in a game. He is the only player other player than Jabbar to lead the league in scoring, rebounding and blocked shots (again, perhaps Chamberlain and Russell could have done it if they counted blocked shots and Olajuwon just missed doing it, finishing second in scoring once). Other than Jordan, he is the only player to win MVP, defensive player of the year and rookie of the year (again, Olajuwon just misses, as he was a rookie the same year Jordan was but got the next most votes) and was the only player ever to be in the top 5 in rebounding, blocks and steals in a year (guess who just missed?). And though no threat to be the league leader in free throw percentage, he was better than any other center on this list other than Moses Malone, making nearly 3/4s of his shots.

Tie 8 & 9. Moses Malone - Moses (who started in ABA) was not dramatic. But, he was dominantly effective. He was one of the greatest rebounders, third all time after Russell and Chamberlain, though they had far less competition. He was by far the greatest offensive rebounder in NBA history since they started counting.  He was the seventh highest scorer of all time, just missing the exclusive 30,000 point club by probably a quarter of a season, and averaged over 20 points a game over 20 years. He was a very tough defensive player, stealing by far more balls than any center other than Olajuwon, and at the same time, almost never fouled out, going over 1200 games straight at one point without doing so.

9. Elvin Hayes - I couldn't choose between Malone and Hayes. It is actually eerie how close some of their stats match up. Hayes came along when Jabbar did and was overshadowed by him. But, he was a great player and excelled in almost every category.  He  is ranked 8th all time in scoring (just barely above Malone's NBA total), number 5 in rebounds (just below Malone's NBA total), 21st in block shots per game, but it has to be recognized that they did not count them his first five years when he was visibly in his prime and he was much shorter (only 6' 9") than virtually every other player ahead of him on the list.

10. Tim Duncan - This was the tough one. I had to leave out Bob Lanier, Dave Cowens, Wes Unseld, Willis Reed among a few others.  Arguably he is a center/forward, but I think that is only because he played next to Robinson for years and they had to call him something else.  I would say he is really a center. They are probably the best all time twin towers.  Some would argue that the quiet Mr. Duncan was even better than his taller teammate. He is among the all-time leaders in almost every category you would think likely for a center. Among active players, he is the no. 1 career leader and no. 2 per game leader in blocked shots;  the no. 2 leader in both career and per game rebounds, and no. 6 career and no. 10 per game leader in scoring.  Anyway, you get it, great player.

I'm going to perplex some with this, but I think George Mikan is overrated because he was the first great center.  I also was not a big Bill Walton fan. But they are in the top 15 or 20. Of course, as men my age tend to agree, Ralph Sampson could possibly have been the best of them and we were all disappointed he didn't make it. I do think it was mostly because of injuries, but, such is life.

Ten best athletes turned actors

Lots of them make the cross-over, but these were the most accomplished.

1 - O. J. Simpson - Okay, he's a murderer. Most of us think so. But, he is also one of the top running backs of all time.  I didn't say these guys were great actors. His best stuff he did, The Naked Gun series.

2 - Jim Brown - Well, maybe Jim Brown was a better running back than O. J. but he was certainly a better actor. The Dirty Dozen, 100 Rifles and Ice Station Zebra were his most famous movies, I think, but he acted in tv and film since I was a little kid right up until a few years ago.

3. Bruce Jenner -  I know, it wasn't much, but he did have a career. He even starred on CHIPS  for just a little while.

4. Chuck Norris. Chuck was the real deal (and seemingly a really nice guy).  He competed in the 60s up into the early 70s. Accurate martial arts fighting records are difficult to obtain for back then and I have read an interesting analysis indicating that he lost more than he claims in his biography, although he lost to top competitors, and that he did not win quite all the championships he claims. Nevertheless, he did win a lot of championships and several times beat Joe Lewis, probably the most famous martial artist of that era and probably everyone else worth beating at the time.  http://karate-in-english-lewis-wallace.blogspot.com/2008/03/chuck-norris-accurate-record.html.  Personally, I could watch his Ranger Walker the rest of my life and loved some of his B movies. His fight scene with Bruce Lee in The Way of the Dragon is one of the greatest I have ever seen. My favorite Norris movies - Firewalker, Lone Wolf McQuade, Code of Silence ,The Hitman, Octagon, Silent Rage and An Eye for an Eye. That's quite a few.

5. Bruce Lee - I didn't know where to put him. He really didn't compete much and it is really hard to tell anything about when he did. I wrote a whole post on his incredible career and abilities (1/21/08 - The Incomparable Bruce Lee).

6. Arnold Schwarzenegger -  I know, he turned out to be a big jerk, and it is hard to call body building a sport, but, if rhythmic gymnastics is one, so is body building. I don't need to review his film career. You know it.

7. Terry Bradshaw - Oy. I hate to include him, because I have trouble calling what he does acting. But, even if it is not heavy lifting, he's been in a few things now including a few years ago, Failure to Launch, and he is not playing himself. Believe it or not, he actually has a star on Hollywood's Walk of Fame. Why, I ask? Why? On the other hand, he is the only one to make this blog twice today.

8 & 9 Johnny Weissmuller - You know, Tarzan.  And, while we are at it, Esther Williams - All those movies featuring her swimming. Why? Because she was an actual national swimming champion and people seemed to like it at the time. Unwatchable now, but, lots of things are.

9 &10.  I'm cheating here (it is just a stupid list) giving a tie for four football linemen.  Alex Karras. Okay, so maybe playing Webster's dad in Webster isn't great acting, but it went on for years.  Merlin Olsen. Another great lineman who had a real career, especially on Little House on the Prairie and Father Murphy.  And yet another lineman, Fred Dwyer,  starred in tv's  Hunter. Then there's Rosie Greer.  I can't think offhand of anything he acted in, but I know he did. Can't be worth looking on imdb. Why did so many linemen become actors? Maybe it's like that joke. Question - Where does an 800 lb. gorilla sit? Answer - Anywhere he likes.

Honorable mention to Chuck Connor, who was a real actor, but was also one of the few people to be an NBA (very early on and on a championship team) and Major League Baseball player (but not so good). But, mostly, he was an actor, most famously in The Rifleman. It's my list and I refuse to consider Jabbar, Shaquille O'Neal and Michael Jordan as actors, even if they did, kind of, sort of act. Life isn't fair.

My guys

This is a list of my favorite players in various sport and mostly when I was growing up. Most of them were the best or among the best in their sport, but they happen to be the ones I admired most:

Baseball - I was not that into baseball and once devastated by the Mets defeating the Orioles in 69, which I considered a travesty of a flash in the pan beating one of the greatest teams in sport history, I stopped watching altogether (well, after Baltimore won the next year). But, when young, I was a Hank Aaron guy more than any other. I still consider him the all time home run king, steroids having tainted that record completely. He was so well known for his hitting it was little recognized that he was an exceptional fielder as well, winning 3 Golden Glove awards. There was a time I knew all his stats.  I am not going to argue that Aaron was greater than a lot of hitters. Some of his records are related to incredible longevity. Now that, like championships, counts for something, but it has to be taken into account as well in comparing players. I was a Willie Mays fan too and probably saw him as the best all around player I ever watched, probably even better than Aaron. I preferred Willie's Giants to Aaron's Braves, but, for some reason I can't even explain, identified with Hammering Hank. Perhaps it was the nonchalance he embodied, rather than the ebullience Mays exuded. I also was a big fan of Eddie Matthews, a much less well known home run hitter who played 3d base on the same team as Aaron for a number of years, during which they hit 863 between them over 13 years - still the record for teammates. Aaron hit more, but I bet Matthews hit them further. His power was exceptional. And perhaps it was because he wasn't as revered I found myself rooting for him. That would be typical of me. And, the Robinson boys, Brooks Robinson and Frank Robinson were big favorites of mine. Frank's career is comparable to Aaron's in many ways, if Aaron was slightly better. But, Frank also won a triple crown, one of only three since Mantle won one in 1956. Brooks was not as great a hitter, though he was good enough, but I thought he was the best fielder I ever saw. His 1970 playoffs was the one of the great performances I've ever seen in sports, both in the field and at bat. For pitchers, three stood out for me - Juan Marichel, Fergie Jenkins and Bob Gibson. The first two were great, and they were my favorites, but Gibson was probably the greatest pitcher of the 60s (I can tell you literally nothing about Major League baseball after that other than a handful of names). His 1968 earned run average of 1.12 (that one I did not need to look up) is almost unbelievable. It was as someone had hit 85 home runs in a season.

Basketball - this was the sport I liked to watch the best and the one I felt most competent. I had a lot of favorites, so I will try and keep the list down. Among centers, no doubt I was a Nate Thurmond guy. He was an underdog whenever he faced Chamberlain or Russell and I wanted him to come out on top.  Aside from him, probably Connie Hawkins, whose autobiography Foul I think one of the very best sports biographies I ever read (not that it is really that many). I felt he was among the greatest forwards I ever saw. He played most of his career in the ABA and when the two leagues merged was still very good, but no doubt he had already played his best years. While he was being blackballed by the NBA, which later settled with him, for being mentioned during a point shaving scandal (never charged, indicted, etc.), he was the MVP of the American Basketball League, then a Harlem Globetrotter for 3 years, then the MVP of the ABA for a year, another year was injured a lot, and then finally got into the NBA. He had a great first year, another good one, then some mediocre ones. He played beautifully, sometimes it seems almost magically, in a high flying class with players like David Thompson, Dr. J and Elgin Baylor (this was all pre-Jordan). Although my memories of him are not as fond now as they are for Thurmond and Baylor, I was probably in my youth most impressed by Oscar Robertson, who I thought was the best guard in history up to that time. Arguably, ever, but no one is going to say you are crazy if you put Jerry West or Magic Johnson up there with him. But, he has some claims of his own. He once averaged a triple double for a season - points, rebounds and assists. Most players are happy if they can do that one game in their career. Not Chamberlain or West or Johnson or Bird or Jordan or Kobe or James has ever done it for a season. Nobody. Aside from being one of the top scorers ever, he is arguably the greatest assist man of all time even though Johnson and Stockton have bigger numbers (it is argued they record assists much more liberally these days). They might be better, but they definitely had much better players to pass the ball to most of their career. And, he was the greatest rebounder for a guard in the league, possibly ever, having a higher rebound per game average over his career than even the much taller Johnson. No doubt he could not win a championship until he teamed up with Jabbar for a magical year in '70-'71 when they won the Milwaukee Bucks' only title, but that was because he did not have many top players on his team. The Lakers and Celtics were loaded and won most years. For me, Robertson was basketball's Aaron - incredibly talented, if not the most talented, but something understated about him. But, that doesn't mean he wasn't intense - he was. I love this recollection by NY Knick Dick Barnett: "If you give him a 12-foot shot, he'll work on you until he's got a 10-foot shot. Give him 6, he wants 4. Give him 2 feet and you know what he wants? That's right, man, a layup." My other guys - Dave Bing (poor Dave, a very talented man, became one of Detroit's mayors) and the ever graceful James Worthy. There were much greater players. I just liked them for some reason.

Football - Gale Sayers was my guy. In my humble opinion he was the greatest running back I ever saw. If his career was not ended prematurely, many more might feel the same way. The year he suffered his first big injury, tearing ligaments, he had a 6.2 per carry average. He came back a year later a different man, but still led the league in rushing. A second major injury changed everything and though he continued to try, that was really it. He still has some records, including the highest career kickoff return average. I was not really into his biography I am third when I was young or his tragic friendship with Brian Piccolo, who died of cancer, but it says a lot about him. I was also a Don Maynard fan. I liked his long ball catching feats and his quirky personality (why do I remember he had muttonchop sideburns?) Even though passing/receiving is so much easier these days, given quarterback and receiver protection rules, Maynard still has the longest reception career average for anyone who has caught more than 600 balls. Though I was never a Jet fan, I also liked (the almost unlikeable) defensive end Mark Gastineau. I was impressed by his talent, speed and power, not his personality. I hated the sack dancing though - hated it. I still remember vividly being in a diner with Bear at 3 something in the morning with Gastineau sitting in the booth behind us, trying to defend himself to his then wife, that he wasn't cheating on her. I'm pretty sure it was both politeness and fear that kept us from laughing until they left. Ah, memories. When Lawrence Taylor became a Giant it made me want to watch them. I preferred when the other team had the ball. Steve Young, Jerry Rice and a few other running backs from my youth stir memories too - Leroy Brown, Jim Nance, Floyd Little and Mercury Morris, the last probably my favorite.

Track - I probably have too many favorites here to go through. Historically speaking, I revered Pablo Nurmi from Finland (see my 4/11/07 tribute to him - The Great Paavo Nurmi). Growing up though, I idolized a middle distance runner named Peter Snell from New Zealand and a longer distance runner from Australia named Ron Clarke. Both set a lot of records, especially Clarke who set 12 world records in less than a month and a half in 1965 and I think had 17 overall. Yet, he never won an Olympic Gold Medal. In recognition of his greatness, the legendary Emil Zapotek gave him his 1952 gold medal, writing that it wasn't because of their friendship, but because he deserved it. Snell's career was shorter and more dramatic. He won the 1960 800 meter Olympic Gold medal, then the 800 meter and 1500 meter Olympic gold in 1964, set 5 world records and then shocked everyone by retiring in 1965, saying he had other interests. He later moved to America. In 2003 he became the national (America) orienteering champion for men 65 and older. Not bad. Of sprinters, Michael Johnson (200-400) meters and Lee Evans (400 meters) were my favorites, though some would say 400 meters isn't a sprint. But, the greatest race I ever saw was the Olympic 800 meters in 1972, won by Dave Wottle. I put the video on a prior top ten list (3/25/12). Worth watching it. Keep your eye on him the race through. Wow.

Tennis - I liked Ivan Lendl, even if he could be hard to like. I disliked Connor and McEnroe, and frankly most anyone with a temper. Earlier, when Aussies dominated, I preferred Tony Roche to Rod Laver, though Laver was the best of his time. In more modern times, I preferred Pete Sampras to Andre Agassi and Roger Federer to Rafael Nadal, though I personally like Nadal better. Doesn't everyone?

Hockey - I just never liked hockey. Period. I guess Bobby Orr and Wayne Gretsky.

Boxing - I was only really interest from the 60s through the 80s. But, in those eras - of course, Muhammad Ali. Sugar Ray Leonard is probably my favorite ever. Alexis Arguello I loved for the poetry in his boxing and his gracious personality. Back in the 70s and 80s my favorites were often light heavyweights and welter/middleweights. There were a number of well matched Muslim convert light heavyweights champions - Matthew Saad Muhammad (Maxwell Loach), Eddie Mustafa Muhammad (Eddie Gregory) and Dwight Muhammad Qawi (Dwight Braxton). MSM (now a homeless man I've read) was my favorite among them, but he lost to both of the other two. He also had an incredible match against a fighter known as Yaqui Lopez. Yaqui beat the tar out of him and MSM took it. You couldn't understand how he was still standing. But all of a sudden, MSM turned it around and put together his own beating. It stuck. He actually beat Lopez twice, stopping him both times. But even more so it was the group of outstanding fighters led by Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler, Tommy Hearns, Roberto Duran and Wilfred Benitez that were so good that every fight between them was outstanding (actually, one exception). Leonard took a championship from Benitez  by a tko in the last seconds of an outstanding fight. Duran beat Leonard once in a dramatic controversial decision (I thought Leonard won, but almost everyone else disagreed) and then a few months later Leonard demolished him in the rematch, when Duran gave up - "No mas." Unfortunately they fought again about 9 years later and Leonard won a boring decision they both got booed for. But going back to after the first No Mas fight, Leonard beat Hearns in one of the most anticipated fights ever, knocking him out in the 14th round with Hearns ahead on points. He retired and Hearns took a championship from Benitez too (Benitez would die young with severe dementia). A few years later Hearns fought Hagler and Hagler knocked him out in 3 of the most exciting rounds you can imagine. Two years later Leonard fought Hagler and beat him in a controversial decision. Though Hearns lost to Leonard and Hagler, he was an outstanding fighter who won four titles and who knocked out many of his opponents. In a sense, he was a human Alydar who had the misfortune to fight in the era of two of the greatest fighters of all time. He actually fought Leonard a second time in '89 and it was called a draw. But, much later on, Leonard admitted Hearns should have won. I don't know that it mattered with both men past their primes.

Other boxing memories. The pugilistic poetry of Alexis Arguello. His two heart breaking losses to the lesser boxer but physically superior Aaron Pryor.  One of the greatest fighters I've ever seen, a young featherweight named Salvador Sánchez knocking out another incredibly exciting fighter with the great name of Danny Little Red Lopez. Sánchez later died in an automobile accident. Too bad for general reasons, but also because he probably was also one of the all time greats. I have to put his picture here, because it looks like Richard Simmons could kick his ass.

 

Uh oh. Went way too long. Sorry. Old men sport memories are like that.

.

About Me

My photo
I started this blog in September, 2006. Mostly, it is where I can talk about things that interest me, which I otherwise don't get to do all that much, about some remarkable people who should not be forgotten, philosophy and theories (like Don Foster's on who wrote A Visit From St. Nicholas and my own on whether Santa is mostly derived from a Norse god) and analysis of issues that concern me. Often it is about books. I try to quote accurately and to say when I am paraphrasing (more and more). Sometimes I blow the first name of even very famous people, often entertainers. I'm much better at history, but once in a while I see I have written something I later learned was not true. Sometimes I fix them, sometimes not. My worst mistake was writing that Beethoven went blind, when he actually went deaf. Feel free to point out an error. I either leave in the mistake, or, if I clean it up, the comment pointing it out. From time to time I do clean up grammar in old posts as, over time I have become more conventional in my grammar, and I very often write these when I am falling asleep and just make dumb mistakes. It be nice to have an editor, but . . . .